Monthly Archives: April 2012

COOLEST CONCEPT #5

Last class we started the group presentations, and I believe the coolest concept was covered by the group who discussed religion and homosexuality. They discussed how Christians frown upon homosexuals. They view homosexuality as “sinful, immoral and worthy of condemnation.” They depicted two Christian ministries which are not completely against the idea of homosexuality. The first ministry being: the gay-affirming ministry. They believe “that homosexuality is not contrary to Christian doctrine; that God makes and loves homosexuals just as he loves heterosexuals, and therefore homosexuality is not an abomination but acceptable in the sight of God.” The second being: the ex-gay ministry. They believe that the “sin of homosexuality is not viewed as being any worse than other types of sin.” Therefore, instead of avoiding homosexuals, the ex-gay ministry concentrates on helping gays over come homosexual desires, so that “they can develop a heterosexual identity that is in line with God’s will.”

REFLECTIVE ESSAY

Through the whole of this course, I have learned various different core concepts and recurring themes. Some vital ones include; social justice/injustice, global sociological imagination, human rights, ethnocentrism, race and racism, and so on. One that I found the most captivating of them all; was the concept of debunking. Debunking is defined as looking at both obvious and surface-level and the less and deeper explanations for social behavior. This concept has been a persistent theme throughout this course. It has helped to unravel meanings below surface level, and to see the familiar in the unfamiliar, and the unfamiliar in the familiar when discussing certain topics.

We have covered varieties of different issues in this course, and the idea of debunking has only improved my understanding of them. Prior to this course, I was unaware of the fact that race does not actually exist, it is a biological myth. I believed race was based on genetics; that people who visually looked similar also were genetically similar. However, I realized that; this was most certainly not the case, as the video “Race: The Power of an Illusion” indicated that our genetics proves that we all are very similar. The only differences there are, are physical ones due to geographic and climate conditions. These geographic and climate conditions for example, can make an Ibo man darker than an English man, just because he is closer to the equator. The only reason these two people become part of either the “Black” or “White” race is due to somebody defining them as that, just by looking at the shade of their skin (this is how racism came into existence). Debunking has allowed me to unlearn my preconceived notions about race.

It has also encouraged me to consider all the possibilities, to look deeper into different situations, and keep an open mind. For example, when looking at a culture that you are not familiar with, debunking enables you to avoid judging before looking beyond the surface-level. It pushes forward the saying “do not judge a book by its cover.” It capacitates looking deeper into the cultures rules, norms, and beliefs. As well as question “why that culture is the way it is,” and “why they do the things they do?”

Debunking is a very crucial concept, which allows one to avoid discriminating. It promotes challenging conventional truths. For example, when I first read Horace Miner’s “Body Ritual Among the Nacirema,” my first reaction was judgmental; I thought these so-called Nacirema people were quite odd and disturbing. However, as I continued to analyze and look deeper into this article I realized these so-called Naciremas were much like us, and that’s when I discovered they were Americans. My reaction clearly depicts that one can be very quick to judge before taking other perspectives in to consideration. In conclusion, I’m glad I enrolled in this course, it was very intriguing, and it taught me important information that I will forever value.

COOLEST CONCEPT #4

The coolest concept discussed in last weeks class was on race, and how it’s a biological myth, however made real in society. I never before last week’s class knew race as a social construct. It was enlightening to discover we ourselves create such a nasty concept, and that if we would all realize this we could probably do something about it. Last weeks class also further addressed that racism and race are two completely different things; however, they rely on each other. Both combined destroy people’s lives everywhere around the world, both in direct and indirect ways. The reason we all look physically different is because of the different climatic and geographic conditions. The only reason these people become part of either the “Black” or “White” race is due to somebody defining them as that.

RACE: THE POWER OF AN ILLUSION (VIDEO)

Race: The Power of an Illusion

(Video)

 Dialectic Reading

 

 

What question did the text/chapter raise?

 

How did the text answer this question?

 

How does the answer match our own ideas and experiences?

 

Does race really exist, or is it a myth?

 

The video answered that race does not exist, it is a   biological myth. We may visually look different; however, our genetics proves   we are all very similar. Some students participated in a DNA workshop they   explored the biology of human nature. The students assumed that they would   have the most similar genes to a person of their so-called “race,” however,   this was not the case. Their findings clearly stated that two individuals of   the same so-called race can be just as different as someone from a different   race.

 

 

I completely agree with the video that race is a   biological myth. I utterly agree as the video stated; “what is black in US, is not considered black inBrazil  orSouth Africa.” Race is a substance of cognition.

 

Chimamanda Adichie: The Danger of a Single Story (VIDEO)

Chimamanda Adichie: The Danger of a Single Story (Video)

Dialectic Reading

 

 

What question did the text/chapter raise?

 

How did the text answer this question?

 

How does the answer match our own ideas and experiences?

 

How are single stories dangerous?

 

This video answered this question by addressing that single   stories create stereotypes. However, as Chimamanda Adichie that the problem   with stereotypes is that they are not entirely false, though they are   incomplete and that causes a single story to become the ONLY story. For   example, Adichie’s roommate assumed so much about her before she even met   her, such as she believed Adichie probably did not know how to use a stove,   or that she could not speak English, and that she probably listened to her   “tribal” music. The reason being she had a single story of Africa. In this   single story as Chimamanda demonstrated “was no possibility of Africans being   similar to her in anyway,” this is utterly untrue as she realized.

I completely agree with Chimamanda Adichie; single stories   can be very dangerous. I believe it is important to view other stories not   just one before you consider making assumptions. As Adichie said “stories   matter, many stories matter. [They] can be used to empower and humanize.   [These] stories can break dignity of people, but [they] can also repair that   broken dignity.” I take this approach in many ways in my life. One of which   includes: when I’m researching for a paper I look for more than just one   story on a topic to avoid stereotypical assumptions.

STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT (VIDEO)

Stanford Prison Experiment (video)

Dialectic Reading

 

What question did the text/chapter raise?

How did the text answer this question?

How does the answer match our own ideas and experiences?

What happens if you   put good people in an evil place?

Good people in a bad situation can transform the good   person into bad. For example, the guards were given a sense of power over the   prisoners, and this sense of power drove them to do some very nasty, ruthless   things to the prisoners. The study clearly illustrated power corrupts and   makes it tough for the victims of abuse to defend and stand up for   themselves. Reason being they do not want to disobey an authority figure, in   this case the guards.  I found this video to be very disturbing. How can it be so   easy to transform into such roles that require one to cause harm to others?   Not only is it alarming that these guards took on such vulgar roles when   given the power, but its also quite scary to imagine if their were also given   the power to be physically abusive would they be? According to the Milgram   study they probably would.